9 November 2015Copyright

‘Monkey selfie’ lawsuit is no laughing matter, argues UK photographer

“Monkey see, monkey sue is not good law” was the argument put forward by UK photographer David Slater in his opposition to a copyright lawsuit filed by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

IP rights for animals is an argument for Congress, not courts, judge tells PETA

1 February 2016 A US court has ordered the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals to take its ‘monkey selfie’ argument to Congress after it dismissed a complaint asserting that a Macaque ape should own the copyright to a photo it took of itself.

‘Monkey selfie’ copyright claim rejected

7 January 2016 A US court has dismissed a claim filed by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in which the organisation claimed that the copyright to the ‘monkey selfie’ photograph should belong to a macaque ape.

‘Not simply a UK copyright issue’: A US perspective on Getty v Stability AI

Debevoise TM litigator with focus on high-stakes disputes joins Polsinelli

Former head of Rouse Sweden launches AI-based TM protection platform

Getty tests limits of law in pivotal AI hearing at UK Court of Appeal

ByteDance dismisses NPE’s patent claims over reciprocal hyperlinks

‘Big Five’ win $19.5m against shadow library WeLib

How a press publisher's case against Google could alter genAI liability

Netlist opens new legal offensive with ITC and federal court complaints

‘Monkey selfie’ lawsuit is no laughing matter, argues UK photographer

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles