‘Monkey selfie’ case nears conclusion
The copyright infringement case brought by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) on behalf of a monkey is nearing its conclusion after a joint motion to stay the appeal was filed.
The motion (pdf) was filed on Friday, August 4, in the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
It stated that the “parties have agreed on a general framework for a settlement subject to the negotiation and resolution of specific terms”.
It added the parties were “optimistic that they will be able to reach an agreement that will resolve all claims in this matter”.
The case stems from a ‘selfie’ taken by a Macaque monkey in Indonesia using the camera of British photographer David Slater.
The photo then went viral, and when Slater saw the picture on Wikipedia, he asked the website to stop using it without his permission.
Wikipedia refused, stating that the picture cannot be copyrighted as Slater did not take the picture.
This led to a copyright infringement lawsuit in September 2015 by PETA, which claimed proceeds from the photo should be given to preserve the monkey’s habitat.
In response, Slater filed a motion to dismiss the case arguing that US law did not give animals the standing to assert copyright ownership.
Last year WIPR reported that Judge William Orrick of the US District Court for the Northern District of California rejected PETA’s claim and stated that any copyright ownership by animals is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
In July, the court heard arguments from both parties in PETA’s appeal.
PETA’s attorneys argued that the copyright ownership should belong to the monkey, not Slater, while the photographer’s defence asked if PETA has a close enough relationship to Naruto to represent it in court.
“Looking at the judges’ faces, I think they were wondering what on earth was going on,” said Slater, talking to WIPR last month.
“Even if the monkey could get copyright, it still doesn’t mean the monkey is a copyright holder; I set up the tripod and this is documented from the first days of the trial in 2011.”
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox
Today’s top stories:
Usain Bolt trademark portfolio suggests he’s not finished yet: lawyers
KickAss properly charged with copyright infringement, says US judge
Grey market sales can be criminal offence, says UK Supreme Court
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk