shutterstock-141110359
Christos Georghiou / Shutterstock.com
26 March 2015Copyright

CJEU says copyright protection can include online sports broadcasts

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has ruled that EU member states can extend copyright protection to live digital sports broadcasts.

In its ruling, issued today (March 26), the CJEU answered a question referred to it by the Supreme Court of Sweden on whether it can widen the scope of copyright protection to such broadcasts.

The ability to do this is not covered by the EU Directive 2001/29, which deals with “certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society”.

The CJEU said that EU legislation has harmonised copyright and related rights “only in part”.

In response to the referred question, the court said national legislation should not be prevented from including sports broadcasting organisations' rights “as acts of communication to the public”.

The CJEU added that this may only be done provided that any extension “does not undermine the protection of copyright”.

The case, C More Entertainment v Sandberg, centres on a dispute between online broadcaster C More Entertainment, which owns the rights to several live broadcasts of hockey matches, and a man called Linus Sandberg.

Sandberg ran a site that provided hyperlinks to C More Entertainment’s live broadcasts. The links enabled users to circumvent a paywall set up by C More Entertainment, which charged €9.70 ($10) to view a live broadcast of a hockey match on its website.

C More Entertainment contacted Sandberg in 2007 requesting that the links be removed, and filed a copyright infringement lawsuit after Sandberg did not comply.

The District Court of Hudiksvall found Sandberg guilty of copyright infringement in 2010, a ruling which Sandberg appealed against.

But in June 2011, the Court of Appeal of Nedre Norrland ruled that: “No part of the commentators’, cameraman’s or picture producers’ work on the broadcasts of the ice hockey matches ... reached the level of copyright protection”.

The court added: “C More Entertainment was not the holder of copyright, but of related rights, which had been infringed.”

C More Entertainment appealed against the decision and it later went to the Supreme Court of Sweden. The Supreme Court opted to stay the proceedings until the CJEU ruled on its query.

The case now returns to the court to make its final decision.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
4 March 2021   As the billion-dollar sports betting market continues to grow, so does its need for pitchside data, but the dispute over who owns it is getting fierce, as Alex Baldwin discovers.