Canada’s Supreme Court dismisses patent appeal against Dow Chemical
US-based Dow Chemical has won a patent case against Nova Chemicals at the Supreme Court of Canada.
The Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Nova Chemicals on April 20, just one day after the Federal Court of Canada issued a judgment on the damages to be paid in the dispute.
Dow is on track to receive one of the largest ever award of damages for patent infringements in Canada, according to its lawyers at Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh.
Dow’s Canadian patent number 2,160,705, called “Fabricated products made from ethylene polymer blends”, is at the core of the dispute.
Both companies are manufacturers of polymer composition products such as rubbish bags and food wrap, and are competitors in the market.
Dow sells polyethylene film-grade copolymers under the name ‘Elite’ in Canada, while Nova manufactures and sells polyethylene film-grade copolymers under the name ‘Surpass’.
In 2010, Dow sued Nova accusing it of infringement and seeking damages or an accounting of profits.
Four years later, Justice O’Keefe found that the patent was valid and infringed by Nova.
O’Keefe heard only the liability phase of the action, and according to his judgment, Dow was entitled choose between damages or an accounting of Nova’s profits.
Dow elected for an accounting of Nova’s profits.
Then, in September last year, the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Federal Court decision by O’Keefe.
Nova had appealed to the Supreme Court over the Court of Appeal decision, asking whether the Court of Appeal was permitted to defer to the trial judge’s conclusions on patent construction or whether is it required to reconsider the issue.
The Supreme Court rejected the appeal
Justice Fothergill, at the Federal Court, issued his judgment on damages on April 19.
“If Nova had not infringed the ‘705 patent, then it would have taken Nova some time follo wing the patent’s expiry to attain the same level of sales of the infringing products that Nova enjoyed in April 2014,” said Fothergill.
According to Dow, Nova’s infringement of the patent provided it with a “springboard” into the market.
As a result of this, Dow argued, Nova continued to profit from its infringing activity after the expiry of the patent.
“Of particular note, Justice Fothergill’s judgment represents the first time that springboard profits have been awarded in Canada, and is potentially the first reported instance of such an award anywhere in the world,” said a press release from Smart & Biggar.
Today’s top stories
Google and Intertrust launch PatentShield to fight patent litigation
Alston & Bird boosts IP practice in New York
Man gets seven years in prison over counterfeit energy drinks
House passes bill making register of copyrights a presidential pick
Facebook, Amazon and Google back USPTO director Michelle Lee
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk