jpstock-shutterstock-com-samsung-
29 November 2016Patents

Apple v Samsung: Federal Circuit denies en banc rehearing petition

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has denied an en banc rehearing petition filed by Samsung in the latest ruling in a patent infringement case with Apple.

In October last year, WIPR reported that Judge Lucy Koh at the US District Court for the Northern District of California denied Samsung’s request to either stay a judgment on Samsung’s infringement or institute a new trial.

Koh ordered Samsung to pay Apple $548 million for patent infringement, with the ruling stemming from a 2012 decision that initially saw Samsung fined $930 million.

In May 2015, the Federal Circuit upheld part of Koh’s initial damages award. After Samsung appealed against Koh’s 2012 ruling, the court upheld the $548 million award for patent infringement but vacated $382 million which had centred on trade dress dilution.

The Federal Circuit declined to hear the suit en banc in August 2015.

In July this year, Samsung applied for an en banc rehearing petition at the Federal Circuit.

However, the Federal Circuit denied Samsung’s petition.

Samsung announced today, November 29, that it is considering dividing the company into a holding unit and an operating company in order to enhance long-term, sustainable value for shareholders.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
22 September 2015   A US judge has affirmed a $548 million damages ruling in favour of Apple in its dispute against Samsung, despite a question mark hanging over one of the patents at the centre of the case.
Patents
17 August 2015   Samsung has been rebuffed in its attempt to overturn a $548 million infringement ruling after the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit refused to hear the case en banc.