German questions on the scope of the Bainbridge decision have been referred to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling. Anna Falter reports.
In the well-known Bainbridge decision dating from 2007 (C-234/06), the Court of Justice for the EU (CJEU) decided in an obiter dictum that it is not admissible to extend the protection afforded to a registered mark by virtue of the proof of use thereof, to a different mark which has been registered but not used, on the grounds that the latter mark is merely a slightly altered form of the former mark.
The question to be clarified in this instance was whether it is possible to use a word/figurative mark ‘Bridge’ by proving the use of the word mark ‘The Bridge’.
Although the CJEU merely expressed an opinion on the interpretation of Article 15(2)(a) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation (CTMR), the court itself pointed out that the content of this provision is identical to that of Article 10(2)(a) of the Trade Marks Directive; the same therefore applies to the provision in Section 26(3) of the German Trade Mark Act.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Bainbridge, CTMR, Proti, mark protection