ImageFlow / Shutterstock.com
Contrary to some reports, it’s clear that there is no uncertainty arising from the US Supreme Court’s Alice decision, insists Martin Goetz, the inventor of the first software patent granted in the US.
The 2014 Alice v CLS Bank decision by the US Supreme Court has caused uncertainty, according to some commentators. Specifically, they say, the decision created uncertainty surrounding the patentability of computer–implemented inventions. For example, a WIPR reader survey in November indicated that 88% of respondents think legislation should be created to end the ambiguity.
Nothing could be further from the truth, however. There is not only certainty surrounding the patentability of inventions that show a computer as the preferred way to implement the invention, there is absolutely no need for new US patent legislation. There are two reasons for this.
Reason one: the decision
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
Martin Goetz, US Supreme Court, Alice v CLS Bank, patents, USPTO, legislation, eligibility, software patent,