In many jurisdictions,‘relevant consumer’ is one of the most frequently used and necessary expressions when determining not only the likelihood of confusion between trademarks but also the notoriety level of a trademark.
The word ‘relevant’ adds a degree of variability to the expression and naturally, the relevant consumer group varies depending on the goods or services marketed.
Turkish Trademark Decree Law no. 556 Pertaining to Protection of Trademarks does not contain any expression similar to ‘relevant consumer’; instead, the concerned group of people is described generally as ‘the public’.
However, in practice the 11th Circuit Court of Appeal (which handles trademark and unfair competition cases), evaluates what ‘the public’ consists of in each and every case with its own conditions. The need to evaluate this expression on a case-by-case basis arises because the type, quality or character of the goods and services always changes the concerned group of people who are familiar with the trademark.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Turkish Trademark Decree Law, relevant consumer