Some major changes to damage claims for patent infringement have been made under Taiwan’s newly amended Patent Act.
Subjective element of patent infringement
The civil remedy of patent infringement in the old Patent Act has been categorised into “damage claim” and “removal/prevention of infringement”. According to the Civil Code, the infringer’s intent or negligence is clarified as a prerequisite for a “damage claim”, while “removal/prevention of infringement” is similar to the removal and prevention of interference in the right of claim for tangible objects.
Consistent with the rationale of damage claims under the Civil Code, the new Patent Act clarifies that, for the “removal or prevention of patent infringement” factual infringing acts or likelihood of infringement are deemed sufficient, regardless of the infringer’s subjective element. For claiming damages, however, the patentee should further prove that the infringer has intent or is negligent of the alleged patent infringement.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
damages, patent infringement, Taiwan Patent Act