ROBERT MIRAMONTES/ SHUTTERSTOCK.COM
The Redskins and the Slants cases, which centre on whether potentially offensive words can be trademarked, are making their way through the US courts, with the First Amendment likely to play a part. WIPR reports.
Taken at face value, the terms ‘redskins’ and ‘slants’ are likely to cause offence.
One is a slang word to describe Native Americans, using skin colour as a defining characteristic. The other, making reference to the perceived shape of their eyes, is slang for people of Asian heritage.
But away from the obvious ability of those terms to cause hurt or offence two US courts are debating whether they should be granted trademark protection and enjoy the benefits it would bring.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
USPTO, Redskins, The Slants, McGinley, TTAB, First Amendment, US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit