The decision in Opel-Blitz II, handed down by the Federal Supreme Court of Germany in January 2010, concerns the use of a trademark of a well-known German automobile manufacturer on miniature replica toy cars.
The decision ends a dispute that began in 2004. The trademark of the plaintiff automobile manufacturer, a horizontal flash whose ends cross the boundaries of a circle, was used by the defendant on a miniature version of the plaintiff’s original car model. The car toy’s packaging also showed the name of the manufacturer ‘Autec’ on its back, and the toy’s manual showed the manufacturer’s trademark ‘Cartronic®’.
The plaintiff attacked the use of the ‘flash’ on the car toy as an infringement of its trademark, which covered ‘automobiles’ as well as ‘toys’. The claim was based first on an identical infringement of the trademark in so far as it covered toys. A second line of argument was that the trademark was a well-known trademark for automobiles, and that its use in the context of a miniature car model made unfair use of its reputation.
The first instance court referred the case to the European Court of Justice, which issued a preliminary ruling in 2007. The ECJ answered the first instance court’s questions as follows:
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Opel-Blitz II, trademark infringement