A trial court decision that was delivered in June by Judge Marcio Solter will force IMPI practice to improve (Komlog v Vice Commissioner for Patents at IMPI).
A trial court decision that was delivered in June by Judge Marcio Solter, who sits in the 31st Federal Court in Rio de Janeiro, an IP trial court that hears cases against the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI), will force IMPI practice to improve (Komlog v Vice Commissioner for Patents at IMPI).
Created in 1970, IMPI was perceived as an agency with management problems. Nowadays, its patent backlog is huge (almost 10 years for first office action), and examination quality is low and plagued by red tape. Problems such as a lack of transparency at IMPI tend to be overlooked by inventors who have a host of other difficulties to contend with when dealing with the agency.
IMPI makes patent applications available as filed only, by means of a link to the European Patent Office (EPO) website, which has published Brazilian applications since August 1, 2006. However, links to EPO Espacenet often return the following message: “Invalid or missing parameters in the request”. Nevertheless, this is better than having nothing published, which is IMPI standard policy regarding issued patents.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
IMPI, patent examination