the-fame-game-620-1
1 October 2012TrademarksMahua Roy Chowdhury

The fame game: well-known and famous marks in India

The Indian courts accepted the rights of famous or well-known marks even when the existing statute at that time did not specifically allow registration of them in the normal course of events. The amended (new) statute of 1999 defined well-known marks. Further, the amended statute recognised wellknown marks irrespective of whether they are Indian or foreign marks.

The courts have favoured well-known trademark owners in several cases involving Whirlpool, Volvo, Ford, Mercedes Benz, Hyundai and Honda, as well as in the case of Sony. The doctrine of dilution was applied in all these cases of passing-off.

Although the amended statute laid down determining factors for the Registrar to consider, it does not specify the factors which the court needs to consider while determining whether a mark is well-known.

Recently, the Delhi High Court in Tata Sons Ltd v Manoj Dodia and Ors discussed at length the factors for determining well-known marks. In this case, the conventional principle of likelihood of confusion was found to be inadequate by the court as a means of protecting well-known marks.

The court observed that the owner of a well-known trademark may seek cancellation or prevent registration of a trademark which is the same or similar to the well-known mark, irrespective of whether the impugned mark is in relation to identical or similar goods or services, or in relation to other categories of goods or services. The right holder may also prevent others from incorporating the well-known trademark as a part of their corporate name/business names.

Even if a well-known trademark is not registered in India, its owner may avail itself of these rights in respect of the trademark registered/used or sought to be registered/used in India, provided that the wellknown mark is otherwise known to or recognised by the relevant section of public in India.

The Delhi High Court in the above case stated that in the interest of foreign investment in India, foreign well-known marks should be protected.

“Our country is now almost in the league of advanced countries. More and more foreign companies are entering our markets, with latest products. They would be discouraged to enter our country to introduce newer products and make substantial investments here, if the courts do not grant adequate protection to their IP rights such as patents, trademarks and copyright.

"The court should not give premium to dishonesty and unfair practices by those who have no compunction in blatantly using the trademark of others for making unearned profits."

"Most of the products sold by these companies are branded products, the marks on them having trans-border reputation and enjoying tremendous brand equity.

It is, therefore, becoming increasingly necessary to curb such trademark piracies lest they drive away the huge foreign investment our country is attracting. The court should not give premium to dishonesty and unfair practices by those who have no compunction in blatantly using the trademark of others for making unearned profits.”

The above case law was again relied upon in the Toshiba case, in which the court held that the owner of a well-known mark is entitled in law to seek an injunction whether the use is in relation to the same or a different product.

Based on the fact that the Registrar has a statutory obligation to protect a well-known mark, while considering an application for registration the Trade Mark Registry now maintains a database on its official website of trademarks recognised as wellknown marks.

These marks have been determined to be well-known either by an Indian court or by the Registrar in any proceeding. The list currently contains 54 marks, including well-known marks such as Intel, Mars, Horlicks, Pepsi, Glaxo, Pizza Hut, Red Bull and Yahoo, to name a few.

In relation to registration of celebrity marks, there have been few instances since the Daler Mehndi (a reputed singer) case, in which the defendant was guilty of passing off goods in the name of Daler Mehndi in order to obtain commercial gains while the plaintiff had garnered all rights, titles and interest, the right to publicity and the trademark ‘Daler Mehndi’.

The court granted a permanent injunction to the plaintiff. In another case involving India’s most reputed movie actor Amitabh Bachhan and his actress wife Jaya Bachhan ( also a member of the Indian Senate), the court in Titan Industries Limited v Ramkumar Jewellers held that the plaintiff has the exclusive personality rights of Mr. and Mrs. Bachhan to advertise the famous jewellery mark ‘Tanishq’ in all forms of media.

The defendant, a jeweller himself, made an advertisement copying the plaintiffs’ mark and using the same image. The court held that this amounted not only to copyright infringement but also to misappropriation of personality rights, as he had not sought the right to use their photograph.

In Jaitley v Network Solutions Private Limited, the defendant had registered the domain name ‘arunjaitely.com’. The plaintiff being an erstwhile minister of law and a leading member of a political party, had asked for the transfer of the domain name after the defendants attempted to auction it.

The courts held that well-known personalities need to have their names protected as they have established a mark for themselves even in the virtual world. As an eminent personality, Arun Jaitley falls within this purview.

A reputed celebrity chef, Sanjeev Kapoor, went further and registered variations of his photograph and images as trademarks. Many Indian celebrities, such as Sachin Tendulkar (cricketer), A.R. Rahman (musician), Shah Rukh Khan (movie actor), Kajol (movie actress), and Baba Ramdev (yoga guru), have registered/ applied for their personal name as a trademark.

All this demonstrates that besides protecting well-known trademarks, the Trade Mark Registry and courts have duly recognised celebrity rights.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk