The American sports equipment company, Icon Health & Fitness won a declaratory judgment on entitlement to a utility model patent application for a multi-function body training apparatus at the second instance of the IP court.
The dispute involves Ab Glider, a best-selling fitness apparatus advertised on TV and Internet shopping channels. Back in December 21, 2009, Icon sent an initial basic drawing of Ab Glider, the fitness apparatus at issue, by email to its original equipment manufacturer (OEM) in Taiwan, requesting a quotation and a sample apparatus.
The drawing and details of Icon’s requests were subsequently sent to a downstream manufacturer associated with the OEM for further handling.
On April 27, 2010, a marketing assistant of the downstream manufacturer filed a utility model patent application for a multi-function sports apparatus that was suspiciously similar to Ab Glider. The patent was granted by the Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) four months after the application was filed.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on email@example.com.
Taiwan, AB Glider, Patent, TIPO, Patent Act