During the late 1990s, the Dutch were famous not only for their cheese, but also for their cross border injunctions.
The court in The Hague, highly specialised in patent law, assumed jurisdiction in most cross border patent cases. The Hague would readily grant a cross border injunction when it judged the plaintiff to be right.
This changed when the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) put an end to this practice in its 2006 GAT-LuK ruling. This ruling was based on the Convention of September 27, 1968, entitled Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
It was then decided that only the judge of the country in which the patent is registered has jurisdiction relating to the registration or validity of a patent, irrespective of whether the issue is raised by way of an action or a plea in objection. This rule is based on the following arguments:
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Cross border injunctions, patent law, The Netherlands