Antonov Roman / Shutterstock.com
The IP world is awaiting a potentially landmark decision from the CJEU in Huawei v ZTE, which centres on the debate around SEPs and the terms for their issuance. WIPR reports.
It is a case of ‘East meets West’. Huawei and ZTE, two of China’s major smart phone players, are in engaged in a patent dispute at Europe’s highest court that arose from both parties’ efforts to market their phones in the Western world.
With the arguments heard, it is now a waiting game until a final judgment is released. As patent practitioners in Europe go about their daily business, half an eye will now surely be on Luxembourg as the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) prepares to rule on what could be a potentially landmark decision.
The case, Huawei v ZTE, centres on standard-essential patents (SEPs) and fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. All SEPs, which protect technology essential to an implementing an industry standard, are required to be licensed on FRAND terms—although what exactly constitutes FRAND is not clear.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
Huawei v ZTE, SEPs, CJEU, FRAND, 4G LTE, standard-essential patents