Recent cases in Germany have illuminated the thorny issue of how to quantify damages in copyright cases. Jens Künzel explains.
Most parents in the industrialised world will probably know the Tripp-Trapp chair. It is a children’s chair made of wood with a quite simple but memorable design, advertised by the original manufacturer as the ‘chair which grows with your child’.
The success of the original chair has spurred many competitors (or companies that aspired to be competitors) to market and distribute chairs whose design was at least very similar to the original chair design. The Tripp-Trapp chair case decided by the Federal Supreme Court of Germany on May 14, 2009 concerns one of the many ‘copies’ of the original chair.
The defendant had not contested the evaluation of the appeal court in Hamburg that the original Tripp-Trapp chair enjoys copyright protection as a “work of applied art”. The subject matter of the case concerned the computation of quantified damages for copyright infringement. In that respect, the decision of the Federal Supreme Court will not only affect copyright cases, but all cases involving the infringement of intellectual property rights.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
Tripp-Trapp chair, quantifying damages, IP infringement