In a hearing before the Singapore Registrar of Patents in 2009, Advanced Systems Automation Ltd. filed applications for restoration of its 12 patents between 10 and 29 months after the patent renewal due dates.
The evidence filed by the proprietor in support of the applications for restoration was that the patent renewal due dates coincided with an unanticipated downturn in the global electronics market, which was beyond its control. Its patents had lapsed not due to a lack of vigilance, but because the company was not in a position to renew its patents due to lack of financial resources.
Reference was made to Section 39(5) of the Singapore Patents Act, which requires the patentee to show reasonable care to ensure that any renewal fee is paid within the prescribed period or that the fee and any prescribed additional fees are paid within the six months immediately following the end of that period.
The registrar referred to the comment of Judge Aldous in the Continental Manufacturing & Sales Inc’s Patent case and distilled a three-pronged test as follows:
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
patent restoration, Advanced Systems Automaton, Singapore Patents Act