x

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Continue if you are OK with this or read more in our privacy policy. 




News analysis: Why the new PTAB rules are no laughing matter

17-05-2016

News analysis: Why the new PTAB rules are no laughing matter

Ollyy / Shutterstock.com

On April 1, the US Patent and Trademark Office published a new set of rules for cases heard before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. WIPR reviews the changes and what they may mean for lawyers.

In the Western world, the first day of the fourth month is usually reserved for tall stories and childish pranks.

But there was no April Fools’ Day fun from the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) this year. On April 1, US practitioners woke up to the news that their roles were about to change thanks to new rules centring on Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) cases.

Published in the Federal Register, the new rules stemmed from changes first proposed by the USPTO in August last year and are related to inter partes reviews (IPRs), post-grant reviews (PGRs) and covered business method reviews.


US Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, BRI, Phillips, post grant proceedings, patent,

WIPR

Payment types accepted