Peruvian law provides two ways to obtain protection against the misuse of registered trademarks.
The first is the administrative channel through infringement actions filed before Peru’s patent and trademark office (INDECOPI), based on Decision 486 of the Andean Community and Legislative Decree No. 1075. The second is the judicial channel through the laws against the infringement of industrial property rights contained in the Penal Code.
To date, the administrative channel is the most used channel because of the speed of procedures and the possibility of finding an agreement to repair as far as possible the interests of injured trademark owners, because it contemplates the possibility that at the conciliation hearing the infringer would pay some sort of financial compensation for its actions.
In the administrative channel no fraud is needed to constitute an infringement. It must merely be demonstrated that the accused is responsible for the relevant act of commerce in order to prove administrative responsibility.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on email@example.com.
INDECOPI, trademark protection, anti-counterfeiting