The Internet has thrown protection of copyright into a whole new dimension.
The counterparts of normally harmless actions can infringe copyright when performed on the internet. Giving an address of a location where one might see certain images, for example, is generally harmless in real life. On the Internet, however, it can be like opening Pandora’s box.
Sharing an address on the internet is hyperlinking. A more advanced form of hyperlinking is embedding, which is basically the same except that the viewer does not have to click a link: the target website is loaded inside the host website and both can be viewed at the same time. Hyperlinking and embedding are generally harmless. When the given address concerns copyrighted material, however, things change.
In a recent preliminary ruling, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) looked into a case referred to it by the Svea Court of Appeal into whether hyperlinking and embedding should be considered as acts of communication to the public, as mentioned in Article 3 of the European Copyright Directive. The case involved a number of Swedish journalists (Svensson et al) and Retriever Sverige, a company that provides links to online articles in which the journalists own the copyright.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
copyright infringement, CJEU, hyperlinks