isak55 / Shutterstock.com
The revised guidelines on computer-related inventions by the Indian Patent Office imply a reversed position on whether software inventions should be patentable. Abhishek Pandurangi of Khurana & Khurana reports.
While the previous guidelines were kept in abeyance in response to strong protests by critics, a revision was expected, but surprisingly the IPO has replaced an excessively liberal set of guidelines indicating that any software is patentable with a contrary one which almost indicates that no software patents are allowed.
Among other deviations, while the previous guidelines gave several examples of software and quasi-business method claims that were acceptable—some of them inconceivably broad—the present guidelines do not offer a single patentable example. Below is an example in the previous guidelines which led to raised eyebrows across the industry:
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on email@example.com.
Abhishek Pandurangi, Khurana & Khurana, India Patent Office, Alice Corp v CLS Bank, patent, software patent, Patent Act, Ericsson,