BIKERIDERLONDON / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM
How to simultaneously promote one’s image and protect one’s personal rights, especially in a social media world, is a challenge for today’s celebrities. WIPR investigates the world of image rights and the blurry line between endorsement and exploitation.
To what extent can a celebrity’s image be protected? This question was raised during actress Katherine Heigl’s $6 million complaint against pharmacy Duane Reade. In the case, filed at the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in May 2014, Heigl said that a tweet by the company suggested she had endorsed it.
She later withdrew the lawsuit but her claim demonstrated just how much value a celebrity can place on his or her image. For the likes of Heigl and other famous actors and musicians, a large amount of their income is derived from sponsoring and endorsing big brands.
“There is no way that $6 million would have been a reasonable licence fee for a tweet,” says David Bernstein, partner at law firm Debevoise & Plimpton. “We’re not talking about a national advertising campaign or full pages in magazines; we’re talking about something extremely ephemeral, which would disappear soon after it is tweeted.”
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on email@example.com.
Image rights; Katherine Heigl; Guernsey Intellectual Property Office Image Rights register