bahri altay / Shutterstock.com
The Court of Justice of the European Union issued its judgment in Huawei v ZTE last week but the ruling is not as clear or comprehensive as it might be. Lorna Brazell, partner at law firm Osborne Clarke, discusses what IP owners still want to know.
When does seeking an injunction to prevent use of a standard-essential patent (SEP) abuse a dominant position?
The patent world has been waiting with bated breath for the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to hand down its judgment on this hotly debated topic in the Huawei v ZTE case.
The waiting was finally over on July 16 when, in a remarkably succinct decision, the CJEU confirmed that bringing an action for a prohibitory injunction against an alleged infringer by a SEP owner may (but will not invariably) constitute an abuse of dominance, which would be contrary to article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Huawei v ZTE, The Court of Justice of the European Union, CJEU, SEP, FRAND, EU,