On June 19, 2014 the US Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Alice Corporation Pty Ltd v CLS Bank International (Alice), affirming the underlying Federal Circuit’s opinion finding all claims of the patent in suit invalid.
The basis for this decision? All of the patent claims are drawn to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 USC §101, namely, that they are drawn to an abstract idea of intermediated settlement, merely requiring generic implementation of a computer.
Alice’s patent is directed to the use of a third party to mitigate settlement risk, an economic practice long utilised in commerce. The court found that the patent in suit’s method claims fail to bridge the gap between an abstract idea and an invention which is patent-eligible.
Patent attorneys are considering and deliberating on the effect this landmark decision will have upon several aspects of their practice, as well as the effect it may have upon the patent portfolios of their clients. There is no question that many presumptively valid patents when issued by the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) are actually, after the Alice decision, invalid and of no value. The manner in which attorneys draft and craft patent claims is affected by Alice.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Alice; patent portfolio; patent registration; patent eligibility; patents