‘Blond’ and ‘Blond Amsterdam’ are trademarks of the Dutch company Blond Amsterdam and used for a popular brand of tableware.
This tableware, consisting of plates, tea cups, sugar bowls, cookie bowls, etc, is decorated with colourful images of hearts, cupcakes, strawberries, sugar lumps, coffee beans, girl figures and handwritten texts. The typical style of the tableware is known throughout the Netherlands among young, mostly female, consumers.
Apparently, this popularity caused another company, Xenos, to introduce tableware which also depicts colourful hearts, cupcakes and happily chatting girls. Blond was not amused and started interim injunction proceedings, based on copyright infringement and slavish imitation. The first instance court rejected all Blond’s claims, stating that a certain sphere and style cannot be copyright-protected.
It also denied the slavish imitation claim based on the negative consequential affect of the Dutch Copyright Act, and the lack of exceptional circumstances. Blond appealed against this decision, persisting in its claims. On February 28, 2012 the Court of Appeal of Hertogenbosch handed down its decision.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on email@example.com.
Netherlands, Blonde Amsterdam, injunction