Indian courts have issued much-needed clarification on the liability of websites that link to or frame copyright infringing material. Nishchal Anand and Aditya Gupta explain.
The crime scene: a murder has taken place. The accused is arrested. The weapon retrieved is a gun. The gun is licensed in John’s name. John has been ‘linked’ to the crime scene. However, had the gun been found in John’s possession, John would have been ‘framed’ in the crime scene.
In this article we will discuss the concepts of ‘linking’ and ‘framing’, as well as the liability for linking or framing infringing content, not in the setting of a crime scene but in the context of infringement over the Internet.
What is linking?
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
linking, framing, India, Delhi High Court, copyright infringement