Russian courts have started to interpret the limits of exclusive and fair use of trademarks, as Alexey Zalesov and Tatiana Petrova report.
A fair balance between the interests of society and right holders is the object of legal regulation in the sphere of intellectual property. From this viewpoint, legal regulation of issues relating to fair use of a third party’s trademark appears to be of great interest. The fair use of a third party’s trademark implies an authorisation (with certain conditions) to use a trademark belonging to another person for the goods it was registered for.
This problem has been traditionally regarded as ‘the task of tasks’ for law makers and courts because of its complexity, and the inherent contradictions in the legal phenomenon of unapproved use of trademarks. The legal problem has been thoroughly worked through in IP laws of different countries. Russian IP law and practice leave a lot of unsolved problems in this area.
Russian law on trademarks incorporated in Part IV of the Russian Civil Code does not regulate the issue, with two exceptions: the national principle of exhaustion and the regulation of collisions between company names, trade names and trademarks.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
fair use, Epson, technology