Individuals and small companies who own US patents encounter hurdles when faced with suing infringers, including the significant legal costs associated with representation.
The issue of how a patent litigator will charge for such services is normally a difficult consideration in retaining an attorney. Attorneys’ fees are generally charged on an hourly basis, a fixed fee basis, a contingency basis, or combinations thereof.
Patent litigation fees often reach millions of dollars, even in cases involving a single patent. Out-of-pocket costs, such as testifying expert fees, transcripts of proceedings, photocopying and legal research, may add up to tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. Under these circumstances, the only viable avenue for a party without such financial resources may be to pursue high-quality representation under a contingency fee arrangement with willing counsel.
Unlike English law, under which a losing party in litigation is expected to pay the winning side’s legal expenses, the US legal system has evolved to avoid the ‘loser pays’ requirement and to permit contingency fees. A contingency fee is normally payable only upon successful completion of the services, where there is a recovery or another favourable result.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on email@example.com.
legal costs, patent infringement