Chilean IP practice shows a strong record against trademark piracy.
Although Chile became a member of the Paris Convention in 1991 and subsequently formally established a legal prohibition to register famous and notorious trademarks created and registered abroad by others, our competent courts had ruled against trademark piracy well before 1991.
This appears as a contradiction because in addition to the lack of an explicit legal provision against piracy, Chilean trademark law does not have any provisions on the lack of use of a trademark. Indeed, the lack of use of a registered trademark has no effect at all and may not be used as the basis for a cancellation action.
In other words, a trademark may be registered forever, provided it is renewed every 10 years, and nobody can challenge it even if it has never been actually used. The absence of trademark use requirements favour trademark piracy because a local registration may indefinitely block a legitimate trademark owner from introducing his products or services to Chile, finding that a pirate anticipated him by registering the trademark in his name.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Chile, INAPI, Paris Convention, piracy, Calvin Klein