marog - pixcells / Shutterstock.com
If 3D printing begins to make real inroads into traditional product markets, then IP owners and law makers will need to work out how to address the potential pitfalls, says Matt Hervey of Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co.
3D printers are becoming increasingly popular. Once affordable only to large manufacturers (BMW was an early adopter) or to specialist prototyping bureaus, 3D printers are now commonly owned by product designers, architects and schools. A new generation of (relatively) reliable and slickly designed printers is targeting the home enthusiast.
This popularity has fuelled intellectual property concerns. The nightmare scenario for IP owners is that their products go the way of music and video: rampant online sharing of files for the creation of copies of their products that are printed at home. As if to confirm this, The Pirate Bay, the notorious online collection of pirated music and videos, introduced a ‘physibles’ category for 3D printing files. Gartner, the information technology research and advisory firm, has predicted “intellectual property theft worth at least $16 billion in 2016 due to 3D printing”. As explored below, such concerns may, for now, be overstated.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Matt Hervey, Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co, 3D printing, IP, counterfeits, technology, 3D printing,