For many luxury brands, copycats are the major issue when it comes to protecting their interests, and recent lawsuits suggest that it may not just be the traditional counterfeiting hotspots that they need to worry about, as WIPR finds out.
For luxury goods manufacturers, brand is everything. Luxury products might be defined first as those for which the price paid by the consumer has a weak relationship with the cost (in terms of labour and materials) of the goods, and then as those for which demand is not proportionally related to improving economic wealth.
So a pair of shoes produced by a non-luxury brand might cost $150, while a similar pair (in terms of production costs, though not in terms of ‘quality’) produced by a luxury brand might cost $1,500. The difference in those prices is in part to do with supply, but it is also to do with the brand itself, and everything that goes into it: how and where it is sold, who wears it, the history of the brand, how it is marketed—there are countless influencing factors.
"While luxury goods brands clearly do need to monitor international counterfeiting hotspots closely, they should also keep an eye on developments closer to home."
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
IP, counterfeit, Tiffany & Co,