In 2011, representatives from seven of the world’s major IP offices convened in Germany with the aim of increasing coordination in patent law. A harmonised grace period was one of the key ideas under consideration. But, as WIPR discovered, it has yet to be agreed.
The European Patent Office (EPO), the Danish Patent and Trademark Office, the French Patent Office, the German Patent and Trademark Office, the Japanese Patent Office (JPO), the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) and the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) all joined the discussions.
Put simply, the grace period protects an applicant who files a patent application even if the invention has previously been made public. It has worked in the US but many other major offices, including the EPO and the JPO, are yet to adopt it.
Usually, disclosure of research or details of an invention prior to an application being filed is considered to count against the award of a patent. The finer details of an invention can be considered ‘prior art’ and then need to be assessed to see whether the invention is new and inventive.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email James Lynn on firstname.lastname@example.org.
EPO, USPTO, patent application, grace period